|
It can help to stand back and notice something extraordinary: in terms of
our eonic sequence, the tide of democratic revolution, appearing at the Great
Divide, is the second instance of this effect, visible in the emergence of
democracy in the earlier phase of our eonic sequence. The spooky nature of this
timing is something that defies easy understanding, but is a reminder that the
name of the game is democratic freedom. Any leftist counterrevolution against
that great experiment is likely to deviate at once from the eonic impetus. A
point to keep clear in the subsequent chaotifications of bolshevism. And the
reason many of the oddly conservatizing agents of the bourgeois sphere make
themselves hoarse with libertarian denunciations of the deviated marxisms
flooding the globalization sphere.
There we have it: the field of leftist globalization is prone, for
theoretical reasons suddenly apparent, to deviations from what would seem (but
haven't necessarily been so derived as) eonic teleological projections. Note
that teleology is a property of the macro system, hence unknown to us, but as
sheer guesswork we can see that its projections from the transition interval of
democratic emergentism is somehow the 'name of the game'. Deviate from that at
your own risk.
The prodigious emergence of the American sidewinder in the wake of the
transition, exploding at the great divide, outflanks any of the humble efforts
of the left trying to concoct outlandish fragments of democracy and socialism,
while the first-born of the democratic revolution in America proceeds to such
success that its fate could be to become the victim of that success as a
degenerated imperialistic power thwarting the opportunities of subsequent
globalization. Fair or not, the charge is soon so leveled.
It is important to see that this exemplar is not solely a democratic
revolution, but a colonial rebellion that exploits its opportunity to stage a
democracy. A point to keep in mind as the overwhelming momentum of this creature
of the modern divide starts to find the spastic left barking at its heels. The
attempts, thence failures, of democratic induction in the micro field, produce contradictory
results, collapsing as crypto-capitalist imperialist conspiracies, and require
understanding the reversal from macro to micro in the wake of the transition,
and should remind the left of the left that the Bolshevik tragedy is both proof
of their theoretical inadequacy, yet a reminder as it is packed off to the
catacombs to stew over its inadequacies that a mideonic left is needed to
challenge the imperial degenerations of the democratic revolution.
|
|