|
|
|
|
|
|
In passing let us clarity the confusion over postmodernism that tends to
haunt current efforts to defend modernity. The postmodern phase of modern
thought is a confusing one, but it does accurately reflect the sudden sense of
many that there is a change in the character of modernity. Actually, there is no
such change in the basic elements, but as we have seen there is a difference
between the elements generating modernity in the eonic sequence, and modern
transition, and the nature of the realization that occurs in its wake. The
students of postmodernism are perhaps detecting merely that the modern
transition has long since been over, and that the realization of its potential
may be open so some criticism. No problem with that, but our point is merely
that there is no 'postmodern' period, as such, only a possible change of
qualitative realization. Our model brings home the fact that our evolutionary
process doesn't control its short term future, and lapses into inaction beyond
the series of transitions it generates.
|
|
|
|
|
|