|
It is time to start looking at the idea of evolution in the context of world
history itself. One of the basic assumptions of Darwinism is that of non-random
evolution. It is useful to consider this assumption in terms of world history
itself, which shows a clear non-random pattern, whatever its connection with the
idea of evolution. We assume the flow of world history follows random logic,
conditioned as we are by Darwinism. The rapid growth of archaeological knowledge
since the nineteenth century has greatly expanded our views of world history and
this data begins to show the unmistakable evidence of a non-random pattern in
world history since the invention of writing. This pattern can be seen from
two angles:
1.
The first is of the so-called Axial Age, the enigmatic synchronous emergence of
cultural innovations and advances across Eurasia in the period of the Classical
Greeks and early Romans, the Prophets of Israel, the era of the Upanishads and
Buddhism in India, and Confucius in China.
2.
The second, related to the first, is of the mysterious drumbeat pattern of
turning points or transitions proceeding down a mainline of the diversity of
civilizations. Looking at this Axial phenomenon we are forced to consider that
it is really a step in a sequence, and moving backwards and forwards we suddenly
discover the full pattern.
In one stroke we discover what was said not to exist, a complete Universal
History, rich in interior significance and meaning. We call this pattern the 'eonic
effect', a superset of the core Axial Age phenomenon. This pattern is vast, and
yet we can in this unique case get a better sense of it from a high-level view
beyond the details, a stroke of good fortune.
The
‘Axial Age’ began to be observed in the nineteenth century. The sudden
synchronous appearance of cultural innovation in Rome, Greece, the Middle East,
India and China in a period centered on -600 is inexplicable under conventional
assumptions. Standard causal reasoning about the 'evolution of cultures' fails
because of the simultaneity of relative advances in these separated areas. The
phenomenon does not emerge by slow evolution from the prior state of these
separate cultures. There is some kind of global factor operating independently
of particular civilizations. This is not the evolution of cultures, but a series
of time-slices of multiple cultures in parallel. Since this period produces a
series of world religions a confusion has arisen over the idea of some kind of
'spiritual age', but a closer look shows that the full effect is
multidimensional. For example, in the case of Greece we see the emergence of
philosophy, science, democracy, and much else that doesn't fit into a religious
framework. Behind Buddhism we see Upanishadic yogis, and these shade into a set
of philosophers. Heraclitus is a philosopher, but he is a little bit like a
sage-yogi. Pythagoras is an actual 'yoga philosopher', almost explicitly.
Confucius is a philosopher, but his work produced a kind of semi-sacred,
semi-secular 'culture philosophy' rather than a religion. Clearly our categories
blend between themselves at this stage prior to differentiation into philosophy
and science. We really have two patterns in one, the synchronous emergence of
the Axial period, and the sequential series operating in a kind of drumbeat
pattern. The connection between the two is at first not clear, until we grasp
logic of the overall pattern.
The idea of the Axial Age was codified by the philosopher
Karl Jaspers in his The Origin and Goal of
History. We have Jaspers’
observation:
The
most extraordinary events are concentrated in this period. Confucius and Lao-tse
were living in China, all the schools of Chinese philosophy came into being,
including those of Mo-ti, Chuang-tse, Lieh-tsu and a host of others; India
produced the Upanishads and Buddha and, like China, ran the whole gamut of
philosophical possibilities down to skepticism, to materialism
, sophism and nihilism; in Iran
Zarathustra
taught a challenging view of the world as a struggle between
good and evil; in Palestine the prophets made their appearance, from Elijah, by
way of Isaiah and Jeremiah to Deutero-Isaiah; Greece witnessed the appearance of
Homer, of the Philosophers—Parmenides, Heraclitus and Plato—of the
tragedians, Thucydides and Archimedes. Everything implied by these names
developed during these few centuries almost simultaneously in China, India, and
the West, without any one of these regions knowing of the others. Karl
Jaspers, The Origin and Goal of
History, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953, Part I, Ch. 1.
For the Axial Age period, we have at least five seminal
areas suddenly showing characteristic 'pivotal' intervals in concert:
Archaic
to Classical Greece The period from the Greek Dark Age to Alexander contains
the great clue to world history. The period of Archaic Greece overflowing into
the Classical period lays the foundation for a whole new order of civilization,
and produces the beginnings of philosophy, science, and democracy.
Histories
of Israel The phenomenon of ‘Israel’ is in the Old Testament is a
considerable enigma but its significance falls into place once we see that it
simply reflects its place in the Axial phenomenon. This involves the period from
about -900 to the Exile, and does not include the (mostly mythical) accounts of
Abraham to Moses. No historical myth, theory of evolution, or universal history
has ever produced a coherent account of this history. But the eonic effect will
clarify its status at once, and in a very simple and elegant way, if we see that
the key issue is the core period of the Prophets around which additional history
is adjoined as epic prelude.
China:
The period of Confucius One of the strangest cases of the eonic effect is
the sudden transformation in medias res of the Axial period in China.
This comes right on schedule in the midst of an otherwise continuous history!
The rise to organized states in Chinese civilization begins very early, and yet
we see the synchronous effect right in the correct time frame, as an overlay on
the prior development. China and Europe are both at the fringes of the ‘eonic
sequence’, at this point (we notice nothing in Europe). The Chinese case
is inexplicable in isolation. This shows that the Axial/eonic effect occurs
on schedule independently of the local dynamics of civilization.
India:
Upanishads to Buddhism The case of India resembles that of our ‘Israel’
in producing a world religion from the temporal sequence, as if sifting from a
tradition that is already clearly formulated (relative transform) and existing
prior to the transition. We see that some dynamic is operating independently of
the politics of cultures and empires in the reactions of religion to state
integration. With the forest philosophers who renounce history, India creates a
protected zone, a parallel world in the Axial spectrum.
Early
Rome We should include the case of Rome either by itself or as a cousin of
the Greek case. Note that when we speak of the Greek period we are referring to
a network of city-states stretching all the way to southern Italy. The
appearance of Republican Rome in the wake of the Axial Age is prime data for the
eonic effect. Note that the Roman Empire is a much later phenomenon, and in fact
dramatizes its own deviation and decline from the sturdy Republican beginnings
appearing in the Axial interval.
|
|