|
We conclude our brief 'induction of a gestalt', visible as the eonic effect, and
we can see in spectacular fashion the resolution of what we have called
Kant's Challenge, and its opportunity to liberate Kant from the confusions in
his essay over 'asocial sociability'. The majestic sweep of the eonic sequence
fulfills exactly the subtle question expressed in the first paragraph of his
essay.
Whatever
concept one may hold, from a metaphysical point of view, concerning the
freedom of the will, certainly its appearances, which are human actions, like
every other natural event, are determined by universal laws. However obscure
their causes, history, which is concerned with narrating these appearances,
permits us to hope that if we attend to the play of freedom of the human will
in the large, we may be able to discern a regular movement in it, and that
what seems complex and chaotic in the single individual may be seen from the
standpoint of the human race as a whole to be a steady and progressive though
slow evolution
of
its original endowment.
We
have the basis to proceed to construct a philosophy of history, at once
theoretical and practical, giving expression to both the scientific study of the
causal stream and the realization of freedom in that context.
|
|